A deep crawl could already tell you that 480 pages were missing an H1. It could
not tell you that they were all the same page template, which is the part that
turns a report into an afternoon of work instead of a quarter of it. The
clustering that answers this had been written and tested for a while and was
wired to nothing, so every crawl report shipped without it.
It runs now. A finished crawl groups the pages it read into templates — product
pages, blog posts, the homepage — and a new Templates tab lists them with the
URL shape each one matches and how many findings belong to it. The issues list
groups itself the same way, so a finding that repeats across a template appears
once, under the template, rather than forty times under forty addresses.
Every count on that tab is over the pages the crawl actually read, and the tab
says so. A crawl visits a sample of a site and never learns the site's true
size, so "480 pages sampled" is the honest figure and a site-wide total would be
one we invented. Where the crawl was too large for us to read every page back,
you still get the templates, and the per-finding counts stay the ones measured
across the whole crawl rather than quietly shrinking to the part we re-read.
The tab appears on a deep-crawl report and on a report you share with a client.
An instant single-page audit has nothing to cluster, so it does not show one.